EFEKTIFITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRYDISCOVERY LEARNING DENGAN TINJAUAN EMPIRIS DAN TEORITIS TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP FISIKA
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson &Krathwohl. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: Revition of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. Amri, S. Dkk. 2010. Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif Dan Inovatif dalam Kelas. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka. Arends,R. 2009. Learning to Teach. New York, America: Mc Graw-Hill. Boudreax, A. (2004). Tracing difficulties with relativistically invariant mass to difficulties with vector addition of momentum in Newtonian context. In Marx, Heron, Franklin, eds. 2004 Physics Education Research Conference, Sacramento, California. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceeding. Baser, Mustafa & Durmus, Soner. 2010. The Effectiveness of Computer Supported Versus Real Laboratory Inquiry Learning Environments on the Understanding of Direct Current Electricity among Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. Vol 6(1): 47-61 Carey, L.,2001.The Systematic Design Of Intruction . New York: Addison Wesley Education Publishes Inc. Dahar. 2011. Teori-Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran. jakarta: erlangga. Hancer, A. H., & N. Durkan . 2008 . Turkish Pupils Understanding of Physical Concept: Force and Movement. World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (1): 4550. Hamalik, Oemar. (2007). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Illahi, M.T. 2012. Pembelajaran Discivery Strategi dan Mental Vocational Skill. Jogjakarta: Diva Press. Kim. E., & Pak, S. (2001). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. American Journal of Physics 70 (7): 759. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Iinstruction Does Not Work: An Analysis Of The Failure Of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, And Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 41(2), 75-86. Memes, Wayan. 2000. Model pembelajaran ipa di smp. Jakarta: proyek pengembangan guru sekolah menengah IBRD Loan No. 3979. Direktorat jendral pendidikan tinggi departemen pendidikan nasional 2000. Nirwana. (2013). Penggunaan model inquiry berbasis ICT untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar pada mata kuliah sejarah fisika mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Fisika Jurusan Pendidikan MIPA. FKIP: Universitas Bengkulu. Prosiding Seminar Orlich, D.C., 1998. Teaching Strategies: A Guide To Better Instruction. 5th Edition. Boston: Houhton Mifflin Company.
Rokhayati, Nuri. 2010. Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery-Inquiry Pada Siswa. FMIPA: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Sanjaya, W. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan.. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media. Tompo, Basman., Ahmada, Arifin.,& Murisa, Muris. 2016. The Development of Discovery-Inquiry Learning Model to Reduce the Science Misconceptions of Junior High School Students. International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education. Vol. 11, No. 12 Van, Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues In Computer Supported Inquiry Learning In Science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 23 (2), 111-119. Widodo, Y. T. B. 2006. Brilliant Solution- Cara Cerdas Mengerjakan Soal Fisika Mekanika untuk SMA/MA. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISBN: _________________________
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang
Jl. Semarang 5 Malang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.