HUBUNGAN RELASI GURU SISWA DAN DUKUNGAN SOSIAL TEMAN DENGAN KETRELIBATAN BELAJAR SISWA DI SEKOLAH

Edi Yacob Laimeheriwa

Abstract


Makalah ini merupakan sebuah kajian konsep yang membahas hubungan antara relasi guru siswa, dukungan sosial teman dengan keterlibatan siswa di sekolah.  Keterlibatan siswa mengacu pada kebutuhan siswa, kerelaan keinginan, dan keharusan untuk berpartisipasi dan berhasil mempromosikan berpikir tingkat tinggi dalam proses belajar. Keterlibatan siswa dikonseptualisasikan meliputi tiga dimensi utama atau subtipe yaitu kognitif, emosional, dan behavioral. Penelitian terdahulu  telah menyimpulkan bahwa keterlibatan sekolah siswa memiliki pengaruh pada prestasi belajar siswa (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, dan Paris 2004, Chen, 2008, Dalun, Hsu, Kwok, Benz, dan Bowman, 2011, dan Roorda et al. 2011), Wonglorsaichon, et. Al., 2014. Brown, 1990; Barkauskaite, 2001; Bitinas, 2004; Martisauskiene, 2004; Aramaviciute, 2005 dalam Ciuladiene (2014), menekankan bahwa hubungan yang harmonis antara siswa dan guru didasarkan pada saling menghormati, pengertian, kebaikan dan kerjasama sangat penting bagi keberhasilan pendidikan. Hal ini mengarah pada bagaimana relasi yang terjadi antara guru dan siswa di sekolah dalam menciptakan situasi atau kondisi yang dapat mendukung proses-proses selama berada di sekolah. Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Brown et. al., menekankan bahwa hubungan yang harmonis antara siswa dan guru berdasarkan saling menghormati, pengertian, kebaikan dan kerjasama sangat penting untuk keberhasilan pendidikan. Faktor lain yang dipandang ikut mempengaruhi keterlibatan belajar siswa di sekolah adalah dukungan sosial teman. Sarafino (1994) menggambarkan dukungan sosial sebagai suatu kenyamanan, perhatian, penghargaan ataupun bantuan yang diterima individu dari orang lain maupun kelompok. Dengan demikian, meningkatnya relasi antara guru siswa dan adanya dukungan sosial dari teman dimungkinkan dapat membuat siswa terlibat dalam kegiatan belajar.

Keywords


Keterlibatan Siswa; Relasi Guru Siswa; Dukungan Sosial Teman

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaudoin, M. (2011). Respect – where do we start? Educational Leadership, 69 (1), 40–44. Chen, J. L. J. (2008). Grade-level differences: Relations of parental, teacher and peer support to academic engagement and achievement among Hong Kong students. School Psychology International, 29(2), 183-198. Christenson, L. S., Reschly, L. A., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student. New York, NY: Springer. Ciuladiene G. & Raudeliunaite R. (2015). Whether Relations Between Students And Teachers Are Constructive At Contemporary School, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191. 2855 – 2860. Claessens L., Tartwijk V. J., Pennings H., Want D. V. A., Verloop N., Brok D. P., Wubbels T. (2016). Beginning and experienced secondary school teachers' self- and student schema in positive and problematic teacherestudent relationships, Teaching and Teacher Education, 55. 8899. Dagun S. M. (2002). Psikologi keluarga-peran ayah dalam keluarga. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Dalun, Z., Hsu, H. Y., Kwok, O. m., Benz, M., & Bowman-Perrott, L. (2011). The Impact of Basic-Level Parent Engagements on Student Achievement: Patterns Associated with Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status (SES). Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22(1), 28-39. Duta N. (2015). From theory to practice: the barriers to efficient communication in teacher-student relationship, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187. 625 – 630.s Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. Hart R. S., Stewart K. & Jimerson R. S. (2011). The Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ) and the Teacher Engagement Report FormNew (TERF-N): Examining the Preliminary Evidence, Contemporary School Psychology, 15, 67. Langton,S.W., & Preble, W. (2008). The relationship between levels of perceived respect and bullying in 5th through 12th grades. Adolescence, 43 (171), 485-503.

Miller L. R., Rycek F. R., Rycek K. (2011). The effects of high impact learning experiences on student engagement, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15. 53–59. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Classroom processes and positive youth development:conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of interactions between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 121, 33-46. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (Educational psychology, Vol. 7, pp. 199–234). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Pianta R. C., Hamre K. B., Allen P. J. (2012). Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Pennings M. J. H., Tartwijk v. J., Tartwijk T., Claessens A. C. L., van der Want C. A., Brekelmans M. (2014). Teaching and Teacher Education, 37. 183193 Reeve J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement, Department of Education, Korea University, 150. Ristianti A. (2009). Hubungan antara dukungan sosial teman sebaya dengan identitas diri pada remaja di SMA Pusaka 1 Jakarta. Artikel Jakarta: Universitas Gunadarma: Fakultas Psikologi. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher-Student Relationships on Students' School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research. Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50, 70-83. Sarafino. (1994). Health psychology biopsychosocial interaction. USA : John Wiley & Sons. Shaari S. A., Yusoff M. N., Ghazali M. I., Osman H. R., Dzahir M. F. N. (2014). The relationship between lecturers’ teaching style and students’ academic engagement, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118. 10 – 20 Sheridan, C. L & Radmacher, S. A. (1992). Health Psychology : challenging the biomedical model. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Shernoff J. D., Kelly S., Tonks M. S., Anderson B., Cavanagh F. R., Sinha S., Abdi B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms, Learning and Instruction, 43. 5260.

Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer. Smet B. (1994). Psikologi Kesehatan: PT Grasindo. Sprinthall, N. A. & Collins, A. W. (1995). Adolescent psychology, a development View. USA : Mc Graw – Hill, Inc. Veiga H. F. (2016). Assessing student Engagement in School: Development and validation of a four-dimensional scale, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217. 813 – 819 Wonglorsaichon B., Wongwanich S., Wiratchai N. (2014). The Influence of Students School Engagement on Learning Achievement: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116. 1748 – 1755. Yunus M. M., Osman W. S. W., Ishak M. N. (2011). Teacher-student relationship factor affecting motivation and academic achievement in ESL classroom, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15. 2637–2641


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISBN: _________________________

Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang

Jl. Semarang 5 Malang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.